31
by RoyalKure
Hey Guys, RK rep here. Let us set the record straight because I believe there's a lot of misconstrued information as to what is happening with this particular order which has proven to be quite problematic.
To start with let me present facts:
Delivery progress
Information updated: Oct. 7
Date Time Progress
Sept. 27 4:28 am
Delivery preference - Deliver to post office
Sept. 24 11:06 pm
Delivery preference - Front door
Sept. 23 4:35 pm
Item in transit
Richmond, BC
Additional information
The item is travelling to its destination. It will remain in this state until it arrives at the final processing location. Typically, the final processing scan occurs on the expected delivery date or the day before at the local delivery facility. Check this date to know when we will attempt delivery.
2:23 pm
Item processed
Richmond, BC
10:18 am
Item received at originating postal facility
Richmond, BC
Additional information
"Shipment received at originating postal facility" means we have scanned shipping documents and accepted items from the shipper. Keep checking Track for updates.
"Item received at originating postal facility" means we have accepted the item from the shipper.
Sept. 22
Electronic information submitted by shipper
Additional information
The shipper has created a shipping label for this item and has sent us electronic information.
The information presented in the latter is based on CP's system.
Note that I had highlighted the two dates and time of Sept. 27 at 4:28 am and Sept. 24 at 11:06 pm. These dates are significant as they represent the action of the receiver changing the delivery preference on their own accord.
1. I would like to state firstly that neither I nor any of RK associates made any request to CP in regards to the delivery preference of this item; this was done entirely on the part of the receiver.
2. secondly, If during transit, the receiver requests for the delivery preference of the item to be changed not only once, but twice, what conclusions can be had if the package had either gone missing or is still in transit?
3. thirdly, during the delay in delivery of said item caused only by none other than the receiver, said receiver had contacted RK staff on a number of occasions either claiming the order had not been fulfilled, or asking for either a refund or a replacement.
We conclude that this sender who goes by the email "slendmon", or the alias "slenda mon" is maliciously attacking RK and our credibility as a provider intentionally or on purpose. We don't know what he/she's motives are, perhaps for free product or monies, or possibly simply to 'slander 'and taint our name, as would a "slenda mon".
We at RK are absolutely appalled by this individuals' actions. If this person had given CP any other information in regards to his/her package in a deliberate attempt to sabotage RK and associates, then he/she is hands down one of the most disgusting monster we have ever come across. Shame on you.
The following will be attachments of conversation and facts. I invite you, the reader, and the public to examine these facts meticulously to come up with your own conclusions.
-
Attachments
-
- 72689078_441935016458852_770370081812119552_n.jpg (203.1 KiB) Viewed 13640 times
-
- 72530600_528994497930029_7559079536868982784_n.jpg (177.68 KiB) Viewed 13640 times
-
- 72689078_441935016458852_770370081812119552_n.jpg (203.1 KiB) Viewed 13645 times
-
- 72473866_3521247611222496_4335395234746728448_n.jpg (226.12 KiB) Viewed 13645 times
-
- 72462261_456466054961958_8137698853836029952_n.jpg (107.08 KiB) Viewed 13645 times
-
- 72390492_762461104203108_4734342836927856640_n.jpg (175.26 KiB) Viewed 13645 times
-
- 72275111_827707390977130_4955734674321178624_n.jpg (135.9 KiB) Viewed 13645 times
-
- 72077968_399912257598115_933024036659658752_n.jpg (141.49 KiB) Viewed 13645 times
-
- 71758881_3022208608004664_1941450162685607936_n.jpg (152.48 KiB) Viewed 13645 times
-
- 71747535_2995097644100595_7049119283627950080_n.jpg (241.71 KiB) Viewed 13645 times
-
- 71578105_907924826254246_3284256286027284480_n.jpg (132.83 KiB) Viewed 13645 times